Governance.
Peer Review Policy.
Maintaining the highest standards through rigorous double-blind review.
Review Summary
Review Type
"Double-blind Peer Review"
Identities of both reviewers and authors are concealed from each other throughout the process to ensure impartiality.
Typical Timeline
First Decision4-6 Weeks
Final Publication3-4 Months
The Review Workflow
Our systematic approach to ensuring scholarly quality and academic integrity.
Step 01
Submission
The corresponding author submits the paper through our electronic system.
Step 02
Editorial Assessment
Internal check for composition and alignment with Author Guidelines.
Step 03
EIC Appraisal
The Editor-in-Chief verifies originality and journal appropriateness.
Step 04
Inviting Reviewers
Handling editors identify and invite qualified double-blind reviewers.
Step 05
Review Conducted
Rigorous assessment and formal recommendations by peer experts.
Step 06
Final Decision
Editor synthesizes reviews to make a final publication decision.